Friction
- ↗Customers said identity pages were unhelpful and were comparing them unfavorably to competitors.
- ↗Important identity context was buried in long pages instead of surfaced as actionable insight.
My Role
- ↗Owned the full design process from research and ideation through prototyping and handoff.
- ↗Pushed for forward-looking AI features without losing the core investigation workflow.
Outcome
- ↗Delivered parity with competitors while introducing new AI-driven insights.
- ↗Cut analyst time spent correlating threats by roughly 15%.
- ↗Created a summary pattern that leadership and customers both responded well to.
Summary
I led the redesign of Red Canary's Identity Profiles, introducing actionable insights powered by generative AI and a modernized user experience. The update strengthened customer retention and gave us a significant competitive edge in a previously stagnant area of UX.
The Problem
The original Identity Profiles were a wall of raw activity. Customers found them unhelpful, and compared with competitors' identity tools, the experience felt behind in both utility and perception.
The team also had strong in-house GenAI capabilities, but the real design problem was deciding how to use them without making analysts read a novel in the middle of an investigation.
The Solution
The redesign focused on surfacing actionable insights instead of making people parse raw data first.
Benchmark the category
I reverse-engineered the identity flows from the teams we needed to beat, then separated the expected baseline from the places we could move the experience forward.
Use AI where it helps
GenAI summarized and contextualized identity activity directly in the product, but only in short, high-value moments that accelerated decisions.
Let analysts rewind
An identity looks different week to week, so the page keeps dated snapshots. Analysts can step back to how an account looked before the thing they are investigating happened.
The Process
Exploration
Before touching visuals, I needed to know whether the two-column behavioral split would hold: consistent signals on one side, anomalies on the other.
Competitive benchmarking
I started by mapping the products customers were already comparing us to so we knew exactly where the floor was and where we still had room to differentiate.
Designing and prototyping
Low-fidelity prototypes helped validate direction early, then high-fidelity work tightened the interaction model and the right amount of AI assistance.
Customer-driven validation
Pilot feedback shaped the final IA and a tiered rollout let us capture usability issues before the broader launch.
Shipped
What shipped after six iterations and a tiered rollout.